11/11/2010
Pay Rate versus Long Term Supply Contract...
73% of supply teachers expect pay rises this year
Supply teachers
are increasingly looking for longer term contracts over higher hourly
pay, according to research from giant group plc, the contractor services
provider.
The research from giant, shows that 63.8% of supply
teachers would prefer a longer term contract compared to 36.2% who would
prefer higher hourly pay.
According to giant, schools could
consider offering supply teachers longer term contracts in lieu of
higher pay. This might help rein in budgets at a time when education
budgets are under intense pressure.
Matthew Brown, Managing
Director or giant group, comments: “Supply teachers are much more
focused on job security and minimising gaps between assignments in the
current climate. This is a great opportunity for schools to respond by
offering longer contracts in lieu of higher pay, which may help ease
pressure on budgets.”
“As pressure on education budgets
intensify, schools will need to look at inventive ways of reducing
spending. This may mean enticing supply teachers to trade higher hourly
pay for more job security.”
The research by giant also reveals
that the most important single factor attracting teachers to working as
supply teachers is the work-life balance. 41.2% of supply teachers said
that work-life balance was the most important criterion attracting them
to the job, compared to 32.8% who responded to the same question six
months ago.
Matthew Brown says: “The biggest pull factor
attracting teachers to work on a contract basis is the work-life
benefit. Schools should keep this in mind when negotiating contracts and
link work-life balance requirements with a longer contract term.”
However
despite concerns over education budgets, the vast majority of supply
teachers (72.9%) are confident that their pay will rise over the next 12
months, according to the giant research.
Matthew Brown says: “Though many schools are looking to implement
hiring freezes, this may create more opportunities for supply staff.
Instead of replacing staff lost to attrition by hiring fulltime
teachers, schools may find it more economical in some subject areas to
bring in teaching skills on a contingent basis.”
Click here for More News